| Peer-Reviewed

Jupiter and Saturn Multi-layer Models Rotating Differentially

Received: 2 July 2021     Accepted: 19 July 2021     Published: 27 July 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In a past work, models for Jupiter were constructed in base to a set of concentric distorted spheroids (“spheroidals”) rotating differentially—whose semi-axes are independent of one another—a task that was achieved with a law of rotation deduced from a generalization of Bernoulli’s theorem, and which holds exclusively for axial-symmetric masses. The shape of the mass is that of a spheroid whose surface equation contains an extra term, d/z4, where d is a parameter which measures the degree of distortion. Each layer rotates with its own profile of angular velocity. The rotation law has a simple dependence on the derivative of the gravitational potential. No magnetic fields or equations of state were involved. The multi- structures were demanded, firstly, to reproduce the gravitational moments of the planets, as surveyed by space missions; and, secondly, to be equilibrium figures. For the calculation of the gravitational moments, a minimization procedure was employed. Paying attention on the outermost laye—the relevant one in the present context—of the formerly reported models for Jupiter, we became aware that they all share an angular velocity profile that decreases from the pole towards the equator, an event that, so far, has not been verified observationally. Since figures with profiles of the opposite tendency turned out to be also possible, they should be included as candidates for our purpose, as effectively they are herein as a complement of that work. The same procedure is here entailed to Saturn, for which figures to show one or the other tendencies are as well obtained. The dual behavior of the rotation profiles may be explained by arguments involving the centripetal force. According to this standpoint, the double behavior is a consequence of the algebraic sign assigned to d: if positive, so that the surface is more bloated than that of a spheroid, the decreasing tendency results; whereas if negative, so that the surface is more depressed, the increasing tendency shows up. This, in turn, is because for d negative the radial force increases more rapidly from pole to the equator than for d positive. We point out that the rotation profiles of the current figures are determined from their equilibrium, rather than being imposed ad initio.

Published in American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaa.20210903.12
Page(s) 32-41
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Gravitation, Hydrodynamics, Planets and Satellites: General, Stars: Rotation

References
[1] Cisneros, J. U., F. J. Martinez & D. Montalvo, 2019, ApJS, 241, 8.
[2] Cisneros, J. U., F. J. Martinez & D. Montalvo, 2020 American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics. Vol. 8, No. 1, 2020, pp. 8-14.
[3] Kitchatinov L. L., 2005, Physics-Uspekhi, 48 (5), 449.
[4] Sanchez-Lavega A., J. F. Rojas\ & P. V. Sada, (2000). Icarus 147, 405–420.
[5] Garcia-Melendo E., S. Pérez-Hoyos, A. Sánchez-Lavega \& R. Hueso, Icarus (2011) 215, 62–74.
[6] Helled, R., E. Galanti & Y. Kaspi, 2015, Nature 520, 202-204.
[7] Gudkova, T. V. & Zharkov, V. N., 1999, Planetary and Space Science, 47, 1211-1224.
[8] Cisneros, J. U., F. J. Martinez & D. Montalvo, 2017, ApJ, 848, 109.
[9] Cisneros, J. U., F. J. Martinez & D. Montalvo, RMxAA, 2016, 52, 375.
[10] Cisneros, J. U., F. J. Martinez, & D. Montalvo, American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics. Vol. 8, No. 2, 2020a, pp. 30-34.
[11] Bolton et al., 2017, Science 356, 821–825.
[12] Folkner, W. M. et al (2017), Geophys. Res. Lett, 44, 4694-4700.
[13] Durante, D., M. Parisi, D. Serra, et. al, (2020) Geophys. Res. Lett., 47 (4), e86572.
[14] Iess, L., B. Militzer, Y. Kaspi, et. al, (2019), Science, 364, 1052.
[15] Nielsen M. B., L. Gizon, H. Schunker & C. Karoff, 2013, A&A, 557, L10.
[16] Nielsen M. B., L. Gizon, H. Schunker & J. Schou, 2014, A&A, 568, L12.
[17] Nielsen M. B., L. Gizon, H. Schunker & W. H. Ball, 2015, A&A, 582, A10.
[18] Howard, R., J., M. Adkins et al 1983, Solar Phys. 83, 321.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Joel Uriel Cisneros-Parra, Francisco Javier Martinez-Herrera, Daniel Montalvo-Castro. (2021). Jupiter and Saturn Multi-layer Models Rotating Differentially. American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 9(3), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20210903.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Joel Uriel Cisneros-Parra; Francisco Javier Martinez-Herrera; Daniel Montalvo-Castro. Jupiter and Saturn Multi-layer Models Rotating Differentially. Am. J. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 9(3), 32-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20210903.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Joel Uriel Cisneros-Parra, Francisco Javier Martinez-Herrera, Daniel Montalvo-Castro. Jupiter and Saturn Multi-layer Models Rotating Differentially. Am J Astron Astrophys. 2021;9(3):32-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20210903.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaa.20210903.12,
      author = {Joel Uriel Cisneros-Parra and Francisco Javier Martinez-Herrera and Daniel Montalvo-Castro},
      title = {Jupiter and Saturn Multi-layer Models Rotating Differentially},
      journal = {American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {32-41},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaa.20210903.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20210903.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaa.20210903.12},
      abstract = {In a past work, models for Jupiter were constructed in base to a set of concentric distorted spheroids (“spheroidals”) rotating differentially—whose semi-axes are independent of one another—a task that was achieved with a law of rotation deduced from a generalization of Bernoulli’s theorem, and which holds exclusively for axial-symmetric masses. The shape of the mass is that of a spheroid whose surface equation contains an extra term, d/z4, where d is a parameter which measures the degree of distortion. Each layer rotates with its own profile of angular velocity. The rotation law has a simple dependence on the derivative of the gravitational potential. No magnetic fields or equations of state were involved. The multi- structures were demanded, firstly, to reproduce the gravitational moments of the planets, as surveyed by space missions; and, secondly, to be equilibrium figures. For the calculation of the gravitational moments, a minimization procedure was employed. Paying attention on the outermost laye—the relevant one in the present context—of the formerly reported models for Jupiter, we became aware that they all share an angular velocity profile that decreases from the pole towards the equator, an event that, so far, has not been verified observationally. Since figures with profiles of the opposite tendency turned out to be also possible, they should be included as candidates for our purpose, as effectively they are herein as a complement of that work. The same procedure is here entailed to Saturn, for which figures to show one or the other tendencies are as well obtained. The dual behavior of the rotation profiles may be explained by arguments involving the centripetal force. According to this standpoint, the double behavior is a consequence of the algebraic sign assigned to d: if positive, so that the surface is more bloated than that of a spheroid, the decreasing tendency results; whereas if negative, so that the surface is more depressed, the increasing tendency shows up. This, in turn, is because for d negative the radial force increases more rapidly from pole to the equator than for d positive. We point out that the rotation profiles of the current figures are determined from their equilibrium, rather than being imposed ad initio.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Jupiter and Saturn Multi-layer Models Rotating Differentially
    AU  - Joel Uriel Cisneros-Parra
    AU  - Francisco Javier Martinez-Herrera
    AU  - Daniel Montalvo-Castro
    Y1  - 2021/07/27
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20210903.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaa.20210903.12
    T2  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
    JF  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
    JO  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
    SP  - 32
    EP  - 41
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-4686
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20210903.12
    AB  - In a past work, models for Jupiter were constructed in base to a set of concentric distorted spheroids (“spheroidals”) rotating differentially—whose semi-axes are independent of one another—a task that was achieved with a law of rotation deduced from a generalization of Bernoulli’s theorem, and which holds exclusively for axial-symmetric masses. The shape of the mass is that of a spheroid whose surface equation contains an extra term, d/z4, where d is a parameter which measures the degree of distortion. Each layer rotates with its own profile of angular velocity. The rotation law has a simple dependence on the derivative of the gravitational potential. No magnetic fields or equations of state were involved. The multi- structures were demanded, firstly, to reproduce the gravitational moments of the planets, as surveyed by space missions; and, secondly, to be equilibrium figures. For the calculation of the gravitational moments, a minimization procedure was employed. Paying attention on the outermost laye—the relevant one in the present context—of the formerly reported models for Jupiter, we became aware that they all share an angular velocity profile that decreases from the pole towards the equator, an event that, so far, has not been verified observationally. Since figures with profiles of the opposite tendency turned out to be also possible, they should be included as candidates for our purpose, as effectively they are herein as a complement of that work. The same procedure is here entailed to Saturn, for which figures to show one or the other tendencies are as well obtained. The dual behavior of the rotation profiles may be explained by arguments involving the centripetal force. According to this standpoint, the double behavior is a consequence of the algebraic sign assigned to d: if positive, so that the surface is more bloated than that of a spheroid, the decreasing tendency results; whereas if negative, so that the surface is more depressed, the increasing tendency shows up. This, in turn, is because for d negative the radial force increases more rapidly from pole to the equator than for d positive. We point out that the rotation profiles of the current figures are determined from their equilibrium, rather than being imposed ad initio.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sciences Faculty, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico

  • Physics Institute, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico

  • Physics Institute, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico

  • Sections