| Peer-Reviewed

Potential Attributes of Contractors’ Prequalification Criteria for Civil Engineering Project: Essential Tools for Project Administration

Received: 25 October 2016     Accepted: 15 November 2016     Published: 18 December 2016
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Several research efforts have been made to establish the acceptability of contractors’ prequalification criteria as basis for choosing a contractor to handle the delivery of projects with emphasis placed on the reliability of contractors’ prequalification criteria to yield expected result. No matter the choice of the criteria adopted in selecting the contractor, its appropriateness becomes manifest during execution. Therefore, the essential ingredients needed to meet the demands of smooth administration of civil engineering project is portrayed in the various attributes associated with the criteria adopted during contractors’ prequalification exercise. Hence, this study purposely delves into these attributes as a way of exploring the potentials of contractors’ prequalification criteria geared towards enhancing their reliability to ensuring hitch-free administration of civil engineering project. Its scope comprises clients, contractors and consultants engaging in civil engineering projects. This study shows that contractors’ prequalification criterion for civil engineering project is five-dimensional while its potential attributes are essential tools depicting the diverse civil engineering project administration areas where contractors’ competence is mostly needed.

Published in American Journal of Management Science and Engineering (Volume 1, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajmse.20160102.15
Page(s) 67-75
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Prequalification, Contractor, Prequalification Criteria, Potential Attribute, Civil Engineering Project, Contractor Selection Process, Project Administration

References
[1] Zavadskas, E. K; Vilutiene, T; Turkis, Z and Tamosaitiene, J (2010). Constractor Selection forConstruction Works by Applying SAW-G and TOPSIS Grey Techniques and management.
[2] Oforeh, E. C. (2006). The Cost Management of Heavy capital projects. Vol. 1; Construction and Management. First edition Cosines Nig. Limited. 2006: 1-10.
[3] Barbara, J. J. (2004). Construction Management Jump start. London: San Francisco: 2-140.
[4] Civil Contractors Federation (2010). Resourcing the future national resources sector employment task force discussion: 1-15.
[5] Pierre, D (2003, April 4-6). Risk in civil engineering from natural to man-made hazards. France-Stanford conference on risk issues in contemporary science and engineering; Stanford: 1-14.
[6] Lake, L. (2008). Civil Engineering: Microsoft Encarta.
[7] Masamintsu, O; Khairuddin, A. R; Toshihiko, O. and Kiyoshi, K. (2003, August 18-19). A comparative study on the standard forms of contract in Malaysia and Japan with specific reference to variation procedures. A paper presentation at the 2003 Quantity Surveyors National Conference at Sheraton Hotel and tours, Subangjaya, Selengor, Malaysia.
[8] William, A. H. (2009). Performance-Based contracting for maintenance: A synthesis of highway practice. Research sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in Collaboration with the Federal Highway Administration. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
[9] Ashwin, A. M. (2015). Project risk management: Methodology development for engineering, procurement and construction projects a case study in the oil and gas industry. American journal of civil engineering3(3): 75-79.
[10] Slobodan, M. (2009). Civil engineering projects realization management. Journal of Architecture and civil Engineering 4(2).
[11] Salama, M; Abd, E. A; EL, S. H and El, S. A. (2006, September 4-6). Investigating the criteria for Contrators’ Selection and Bid Evaluation in Egypt. Conference Proceeding of 22nd Association of Researchers in Construction Management. Bimingham, UK: 531-540.
[12] Ogunsemi D. R. and Aje I. O. (2005). A model for contractors Selection in Nigeria. The Quantity Surveyor 50(1), 3-7.
[13] Puoy, P. (2011). Contractor Prequalification criteria, tendering criteria, and tendering procedure in Cambodia building and housing construction projects. Journal of professional project management education.
[14] Arazi, I, Mahmoud, S, and Mohamad, H. (2011). Decision criteria for selecting main contractors in Malaysia. Research journal of applied engineering and technology 3(12): 1358-1365.
[15] Udechukwu, E. C. and Iyagba, A. O (2008). Comparative Analysis of Construction Scenarios in Japan and Nigeria. The Quantity surveyor. 55; 28-37.
[16] Thomas, G. A. (2002): Civil engineering for buildings. Journal of san Diego historical society quarterly- winter 48(1).
[17] Aje, I. (2012). The impact of contractors’ prequalification on construction project delivery in Nigeria. Journal of engineering construction and architectural management 19(2): 159-171.
[18] Ajayi, O. M. and Ogunsanmi O. E. (2012). Decision maker’s perceptions on contractor prequalification criteria. Journal of contemporary research in business 4(6): 174-180.
[19] Ng, T. S. and Skitmore, M. R. (2001). Contractor Selection Criteria: A cost Benefit Analysis Journal of Engineering 484(1).
[20] Queensland (2011). Guideline on Capital Works Management Framework: contractor prequalification criteria; Tendering and Selection Process, Department of public works: 1-24.
[21] Sonuga, O. O. (2010). The shared roles of stakeholders in public procurement – Achieving the best value in public procurement sector. A paper presented at 2-day national seminar organized by the Nigerian Institute of Quantity surveyors 1-7.
[22] Pooria, R; Muhd, Z and Jeffrey, K (2015). Contractor management performance evaluation model at prequalification stage. Journal of expert systems with applications 42(12): 5087-5101.
[23] Watt, D. J, Kayis, B and Willey, K (2010). The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria. International journal of project management 28(1): 51-60.
[24] Xiaohong, H. (2011). An analysis of the selection of project contractor in the construction management process. International journal of business and management 6(3);184-189.
[25] Ng, W. S. and Aminah, M. Y. (2006, September, 5-6). The selection factor of design and build procurement method: A literature visit; Conference proceeding of the 6th Asian-pacific structural engineering and construction (APSEC 2006), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
[26] Rosli, A. R. Ismail, M. T. Wan, B. W. A. Md, A. N. A. and Zainab M. Z. (2006, June 21-24) – Padang: 1-3.
[27] Tabachnic, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson education.
[28] Zhang, X (2005). Concessionaire’s financial capability in developing build-operate-transfer type infrastructure projects. Journal of construction engineering and management.
[29] Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics using SPSS (6th edition), London: Sage.
[30] Bon-Gang. H, Xianbo. Z and Li. P (2014). Risk management in small construction projects in Singapore: Status, barrier and impact. International journal of project management 32(1): 116-124.
[31] Assegid, G, Yolente, C. M and Alemu, M. (2016). Assessment of construction dispute resolution in ethiopian somali regional state road projects: A case study on road projects in the region. American journal of civil engineering 4(6): 282-289.
[32] Aaron, W and Daniel, W (2016). Determinants of successful implementation ofgovernment funded projects in Kenya: A Case study of integrated financial management information system. International journal of innovative research and development 5(10):160-175.
[33] Fuziah, I. Muzani, M, and Fara, D. (2006). Risk Factors of Constractors’ Corporate reputation ICCI.
[34] Zipporah, K. M. (2016). Quality management systems and organizational performance: A theoretical review in kenya’s public sector organizations. Science journal of business and management. 4(5): 150-155.
[35] Xianhai, M. (2012). The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction. International journal of project management. 30(2): 188-198.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Akinmusire Adeleye Ola. (2016). Potential Attributes of Contractors’ Prequalification Criteria for Civil Engineering Project: Essential Tools for Project Administration. American Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 1(2), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20160102.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Akinmusire Adeleye Ola. Potential Attributes of Contractors’ Prequalification Criteria for Civil Engineering Project: Essential Tools for Project Administration. Am. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2016, 1(2), 67-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmse.20160102.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Akinmusire Adeleye Ola. Potential Attributes of Contractors’ Prequalification Criteria for Civil Engineering Project: Essential Tools for Project Administration. Am J Manag Sci Eng. 2016;1(2):67-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmse.20160102.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajmse.20160102.15,
      author = {Akinmusire Adeleye Ola},
      title = {Potential Attributes of Contractors’ Prequalification Criteria for Civil Engineering Project: Essential Tools for Project Administration},
      journal = {American Journal of Management Science and Engineering},
      volume = {1},
      number = {2},
      pages = {67-75},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajmse.20160102.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20160102.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmse.20160102.15},
      abstract = {Several research efforts have been made to establish the acceptability of contractors’ prequalification criteria as basis for choosing a contractor to handle the delivery of projects with emphasis placed on the reliability of contractors’ prequalification criteria to yield expected result. No matter the choice of the criteria adopted in selecting the contractor, its appropriateness becomes manifest during execution. Therefore, the essential ingredients needed to meet the demands of smooth administration of civil engineering project is portrayed in the various attributes associated with the criteria adopted during contractors’ prequalification exercise. Hence, this study purposely delves into these attributes as a way of exploring the potentials of contractors’ prequalification criteria geared towards enhancing their reliability to ensuring hitch-free administration of civil engineering project. Its scope comprises clients, contractors and consultants engaging in civil engineering projects. This study shows that contractors’ prequalification criterion for civil engineering project is five-dimensional while its potential attributes are essential tools depicting the diverse civil engineering project administration areas where contractors’ competence is mostly needed.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Potential Attributes of Contractors’ Prequalification Criteria for Civil Engineering Project: Essential Tools for Project Administration
    AU  - Akinmusire Adeleye Ola
    Y1  - 2016/12/18
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20160102.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajmse.20160102.15
    T2  - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering
    SP  - 67
    EP  - 75
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1379
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20160102.15
    AB  - Several research efforts have been made to establish the acceptability of contractors’ prequalification criteria as basis for choosing a contractor to handle the delivery of projects with emphasis placed on the reliability of contractors’ prequalification criteria to yield expected result. No matter the choice of the criteria adopted in selecting the contractor, its appropriateness becomes manifest during execution. Therefore, the essential ingredients needed to meet the demands of smooth administration of civil engineering project is portrayed in the various attributes associated with the criteria adopted during contractors’ prequalification exercise. Hence, this study purposely delves into these attributes as a way of exploring the potentials of contractors’ prequalification criteria geared towards enhancing their reliability to ensuring hitch-free administration of civil engineering project. Its scope comprises clients, contractors and consultants engaging in civil engineering projects. This study shows that contractors’ prequalification criterion for civil engineering project is five-dimensional while its potential attributes are essential tools depicting the diverse civil engineering project administration areas where contractors’ competence is mostly needed.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Environmental Studies, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo, Nigeria

  • Sections